Comments on: Rebase v Merge in Git

By: Confluence: Verzekeringssite

Confluence: Verzekeringssite — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:18:05 +0000

Git branching strategy…

Introduction We follow the branching model Linus Torvaldus proposed and Vincent Driessen outlined in this article: …

By: icole

icole — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:44:47 +0000

hi!!!

By: tools by Programming - Pearltrees

tools by Programming - Pearltrees — Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:29:34 +0000

[...] Rebase v Merge in Git [...]

By: .Net Head » Rebasing can fail with an updated .gitignore file.

.Net Head » Rebasing can fail with an updated .gitignore file. — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:43:37 +0000

[...] If you are using Git, the preferred way to do this is with the rebase command rather than merge. (Here is a good explanation of the difference between the two and why rebase is usually [...]

By: Jeff Yu@IT » Git merge or rebase?

Jeff Yu@IT » Git merge or rebase? — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:36:43 +0000

[...] Rebase vs Merge in Git 2. Avoid Merge commit in Git, this one shows very detail about the difference on these two options, [...]

By: The Case for Git Rebase : alexking.org

The Case for Git Rebase : alexking.org — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:05:20 +0000

[...] if roundabout read. The anecdotal conclusions are useful to read, but a more analytical approach like this one resonates more clearly for me. Joel Spolsky makes the case that with any DVCS you should think of [...]

By: A

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:16:45 +0000

Would you explain where in the suggested workflow is fetch or pull? Also is there a problem to work on the code without creating a separate branch, just rebase regularly or once you are done and commit/push changes?

Thank you!

By: Confluence: Qt Commercial

Confluence: Qt Commercial — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:51:12 +0000

Everyday git tricks & tips…

Create remote branch: \ git push \u origin git push \u origin newfeature1 Delete remote branch: \ git push origin : git push origin :newfeature1 Remove specific commit: \ git rebase \o……

By: Shoo

Shoo — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:05:54 +0000

And if I may add another difference: rebase will refuse (by default) to work if you have modified files in your worktree, thus attempting to goad you into having a clean up-to-date worktree (or at least stashing the local changes) before you pull the other mods. This is usually a good idea.

(This only regards files that would be touched by the commits you’re about to pull. It doesn’t care about modified files that have nothing to do with those mods.)

By: Harjit

Harjit — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:47:06 +0000

What rebase really says is, to consider the changes that are about to made to the branch, FIRST get the changes that others have already COMMITED to the branch, and then re-apply changes on top of that, irrespective of when the changes were made. This allows you to get what others before you have already commited, and shows you where your changes cause merge conflicts. Also it makes the merge upwards more meaningful, since you would normally resolve conflicts caused by your changes to previously commited changes, before merging and pushing.